top of page
  • Writer's pictureZia Haq

In India, 'corona' is a word for Muslims

Islamophobia has deepened after officials discovered many participants in an Islamic meet had taken ill

A Muslim vendor in New Delhi. Photo by author.

Zia Haq

Jehirul Islam, a coronavirus patient, made a final call on April 10 from his hospital bed in Maharashtra’s Akola to his family in faraway Assam. He sounded grim, fearing something he imagined to be far worse than dying of Covid-19.

The next day, hospital staff found him dead, his throat slit, in an apparent suicide.

“He was worried he won’t be able to make it back home and that, if he were to die, his body would be cremated, rather than buried in a Muslim cemetery,” his brother Moinul Islam said from Singimari, a village in central Assam’s Nagaon district.

Suicides of Muslims are being driven by stigma, rumours and slurs directed especially toward India’s 200-million Muslims in the wake of the coronavirus outbreak.

To Muslims, the war on coronavirus has begun to look like a war on the community itself, as the community finds itself blamed squarely for the spread of the novel coronavirus. This followed a global religious congregation in New Delhi in mid-March, held by Tablighi Jamaat, an Islamic movement of preachers, which met in defiance of official restrictions.

The gathering of nearly 2500 delegates, some from Malaysia, Sri Lanka and Kyrgyzstan, led to a dramatic spike in Covid-19 cases in the country; at one point the congregants or their contacts accounted for a third of the total cases.

Fears of cremation of Muslims, based on rumours, were unfounded. “The government’s guidelines state that Muslim Covid-19 victims should be buried at a cemetery closest to the place where the patient died,” Maharashtra minister Aslam Shaikh told HT.

The religious event led to outrage among both Muslims and non-Muslims. However, Muslims then began to be accused in social media sites of deliberately spreading the virus as part of a jihad. Many prominent Muslims spoke to HT, narrating what the atmosphere feels like.

The hashtag “coronajihad” was circulated 300,000 times, according to Equality Labs, a digital advocacy group, quoted by Time magazine. Ordinary Muslims say the Jamaatis were “irresponsible and condemnable”, but the incident has given rise to reprisals.

In Delhi’s Bawana, a mob attacked Mehboob Ali, who had attended a similar Islamic gathering in Madhya Pradesh, leading to three arrests, according to Delhi Police.

On April 4, Mohammed Dilshad, who had a connection to Tablighi Jamaat, hanged himself in Himachal Pradesh’s Una Bangarh village, allegedly because of social boycott. In Assam’s Nalbari district, Hindu shopkeepers refuse to serve people from a Muslim village, according to Rehmat Ali, a farmer of the area.

In another instance of Islamophobia, an official of the State Foreigners’ Tribunal in Assam on April 7 wrote a letter to the state’s health minister Himanta Biswa Sarma that has shocked Muslims. In it, Kamalesh Gupta, the official, said he and his colleagues had made donations to the state’s coronavirus fund. However, he urged that “help may not be extended” to Muslims linked to Tablighi Jamaat, who he labelled “jihadi”, a synonym for terrorists. Crucially, officials like Gupta are tasked with deciding the fate of Muslims stripped of citizenship in the state on suspicion of being illegal foreign migrants.

It is true that the Tablighi Jamaat congregation led to a flare-up of Covid cases. A senior health ministry official, Lav Agarwal, addressing reporters, had said that the number of days it would have taken for India’s coronavirus cases to double had quickened to 4.1 days from 7.1 due to the Islamic congregation.

“The Jamaat people should have deferred their meet. They have brought miseries on the community,” said Maulana Asghar Ali, the imam of a mosque in Delhi’s Kotla Mubarakpur.

The government seems to have slackened too, says Naved Hamid Moemin, the chief of All India Majlis-e-Mushwarat, a Muslim advocacy organization. “The police made no effort to separate foreigners from Indian preachers at the gathering despite serving a notice on them,” Moemin said.

Last week, the Union home ministry issued an advisory on preventing “social stigma” attached to Covid-19 patients or their communities. It said “certain communities and areas are being labeled purely based on false reports”, adding that such prejudices need to be “countered urgently”. The federal health advisory urged officials to “never spread the names or identity of those affected”.

However, in Assam, health minister Himanta Biswa Sarma publicly released names of all of the state’s 29 patients — one Hindu and the rest Muslims. The minister, addressing reporters, said: “Generally, we do not reveal the name of patients suffering from diseases like HIV”. “Yet, the Covid patients’ names are being released with an honest intention of making people aware and stopping the spread of Covid-19”. Federal authorities have continued to provide details of Muslims found positive.

Maulana Mahmood Madni, a former Rajya Sabha MP and leader of the Jamiat Ulama-e-Hind, India’s oldest Muslim faith-based outfit founded in 1919, said he had urged all mosques and Muslims to follow official lockdown guidelines.

“The shame over what Tablighi Jamaat did is collective and so is the religious hatred that followed,” said S. Irfan Habib, a Delhi-based historian.

The police have registered a criminal case against Maulana Saad, the leader of Tablighi Jamaat, who made an egregious sermon posted on YouTube. In it, he urged Muslims to flock to mosques and said social distancing was “nonsense”. Saad has since gone into hiding.

This article first appeared in the Hindustan Times.

3 views0 comments
bottom of page